Given the flow of obtuse decisions from High Court judges; chicken nuggets, human rights abuses, claiming soldiers shooting IRA terrorists on the rampage is murder, etc.; would omitting them from the assisted dying scrutiny process really be a tragedy that kills the Bill?
There is now a huge gap between expectations and performance, as far as the judiciary is concerned, and no guarantee that a social worker couldn’t do the job as competently, or badly, as a High Court judge.
But the way things are going, the Bill looks doomed anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment